Patricia Volonakis Davis

We're Not Powerless

3 people marked this as a favorite.

This also appears in:

Comments

[this is good]

"I can't". Those two words make me cringe. If there was a million dollars tied to it, in cash payable to you, would you still be unable to do it? If your life hung in the balance and you would die if it didn't, would it? People are so ready to throw in the towel about anything that requires some effort. Even my daughter has been guilty of that. She spouts all the things that can't be done. I spout right back her all the ways it CAN be done.

All it ever takes is one person stepping up and actually doing it. As you've said, one voice turns into many if the cause is just and much more quickly if the path is easy. People are lazy by habit and it has been the government's job to make sure we are lazy with 500 cable channels, poor education and millions of distractions (including money crisis).

It's no wonder all the kids have ADD. It's no wonder we don't know our neighbors. It's no wonder we're quickly becoming a society of sheeple. You can't have a village when everyone has become a village idiot. Bravo for an excellent post!

[this is good]
I love your writing. I absolutely do. You write the truth and I have been trying to tune out of the stupid presidential campaigns. You're right about them not saying anything about the disasters and that is sad. Pathetic, really. I hope that this does make an impact on at least one person that doesn't usually read your blogs =)
Patricia, as always entertaining and well woven together, but as always I disagree strongly with your main point - that politicians are to blame for everything.

First I find it incorrect, but don't care to argue this irrelevant point about whether or not politicians are to blame for our problems.

Second I think this belief that politicians are the problem - a highly populist sentiment, I agree - only leads to policy that compounds the problems of corruption in government. History seems to agree with me. Term limits for example established in CA in 1990 have directly created a greater incidence of corruption as our lawmakers are now largely inexperienced hacks easily preyed upon by the state's entrenched and powerful lobbying interests. The Progressive Party's attack on Political Parties during the twenties set the table for this. Both efforts stemmed from the same blame game - the exact same populist sentiment. I highly recommend reading "Paradise Lost" by Peter Schraag. Perhaps you'll disagree with him, and that is fine, but at the least I think you'll find his review of political history in California informative.

Third, and simply, if you wish to empower yourself to effect change, casting blame upon others for the problems you wish to solve undermines your very effort as self-empowerment. What about blaming others for all your problems is empowering? Playing the blame game is to believe that you've merely been a pawn in the game of others. However , accepting your responsibility as a citizen and as a potential civil servant (the ideal politician) to grapple with (y)our public problems however is empowering.

As always, I do cheer you for fighting the fight. But I will always disagree with populist sentiment. The mob never writes good public policy. Stirring one up with anti-politician rhetoric I find problematic in the least.
Thanks for the compliment and I loved your comment. I often find myself telling younger people, including my children the same thing you tell your daughter- "it can be done!" I wonder if they're saying it can't is just a way of rebelling against pro-active parents? I sure hope so. I sure hope they don't really believe changes can't be made.
Thanks Stephel. That was a very nice thing to say. I very much enjoy reading your blog,too. Have you had a look at the mag yet?
[this is good]

I love how you manage to take all the thoughts out of my head and weave it into an coherent article. Excellent post, as always!

It's nice to see you back at my blog. You are one of the specific people I had in mind when I say we can disagree without sniping at each other. You were so well-spoken and such a gentleman last time we disagreed, it made me sorry I couldn't change my mind just because I liked your style so much. Despite that, your comments made me think about my writing style, even while disagreeing with your perspective. And I have to say I revised it (well...some, anyway) because of some of the things you pointed out

You've made me think with your comments here again. My main point was not to blame politcians for all our troubles. My main point was that we need to get more cohesive as a country rather than by partisan separations, stop pointing fingers for our woes at each other's political parties and/or religious affiliations. I also wanted to encourage people to speak out a bit more. However, I went back to reread my post because of your statement and perhaps I was making too many points in one post. I can tell by the comments I received here and in my private messages that everyone got something different out of it. Oh, well. I should probably reorganise it.

However, since you brought it up, we do disagree on a crucial point once again and that is regarding lifetime terms. I see that as one of the greatest flaws in Congress. A lifetime term makes senators ineffectual in my opinon. FDR was president even when he was too sick to rule. And I'm imagining this president getting voted in again if we had lifetime terms woud be disasterous. So, there you see, we do disagree, once again, as you stated only on something else entirely. ; ) And it's interesting that this disagreement is very much like our teacher tenure disagreement. We simply see two different sides of an issue. You see the benefits of that lifetime trust, I see the drawbacks. I'd love it if you wrote a piece on this and submitted to the magazine. Then we could publish a counter argument.

Now then, let's have a lighter moment. there must be something we agree on. How do you feel about blueberries? They are my favourite fruit. : )

First of all, I appreciate your well considered response despite my poorly written comment. I just want to let you know I don't mean my sloppiness as disrespect to your efforts here. I just have an issue with taking blogging seriously and so put almost no effort into it myself (which is why I am rarely around on Vox). I do however appreciate your well crafted pieces and considerate responses.

And now back to the "argument". To put a finer point on my ... point: I am not for lifetime terms. I just don't like the populist blame game that seeks realization in policy. Term limits as established in 1990 in CA given the structural powers given to lobbyists however INCREASED corruption.

So I prefer that any policy which impacts civil servants/politicians be well considered in light of its potential side effects. Simply attacking politicians as corrupt/incompetent etc... doesn't solve the problem. All policy that reforms government needs to be well considered and crafted. And all policy should engender good government rather than compound the problems it seeks to solve. A conservative view yes, but even us liberals can learn a thing from conservative ideology.

Anyway, I do highly recommend reading Paradise Lost by Schraag. It offers a very good political overview of California. And even if you don't live here (which for some reason I think you do) you can see how California's political history has heavily influenced the state of the nation today - possibly more significantly than any other state.

Lastly, while blueberries are tasty (my wife and I did enjoy over the course of the first year of our marriage scores of pounds of blueberries we picked on our honeymoon and froze in our freezer for smoothies), I prefer to pick wild huckleberries in the Sierras and Cascades. Delicious. But alas marriage and kids has kept me from the mountains so I grudgingly get by on domesticated berries of all kinds bought at the farmer's market (across the street!). Incidentally you can find the occassional wild huckleberry in the east bay hills, but... they just don't taste as good here as they do in the mountains - and I do caution you from wild forage if you do not know how to identify plants.

Anyhow... I am out of here. Good night. Enjoy the heat.
[this is good]
I agree with your remark on myopic reform. I like huckleberries, too.
Great post!!!! I am one of those people who write Senators, Govenors, and even
Presidents, if I feel the need to express myself. I write my Congressman, too. My daughter has always laughed and said I couldn't make a difference by doing it, but if a many people did it, it would make a difference.
I also like your online Magazine and podcast, and will be following it closely.

btw- It would have shown some actual caring if one of the candidates running for office, had taken the time to stop and talk about Myramar or China and the devastation these people have been through, and the help they need, and the loss of lives they have suffered through.

This made me think of the old German proverb "You can't help what happens to you, but you can make it happen the way you want".

Bravo!

[this is good]
Well said P. Captured everything succinctly.
What a powerful post, Patricia. I like your ability to show both sides of the story, and make us consider that those who believed in Dubya's plan for this war (I was not one of them) should have been able to believe in him. That's a strange paradigm shift for someone like me, since I haven't considered the other side in a long, long time.
[this is good]
hear, hear!
fantastic piece...!! btw, im not in ur neighbourhood..lol.

love ur writing...are u a teacher? teacher's are always so articulate..

I love your comments, Tammie. You are always so uplifting and positive. Thank you for the compliment on the mag. I worked very hard on it and it's still in its infancy stages. As for writing letters, are you a member of MoveOn.org? It's one of the online campiagn groups that had a hand in successfully changing the balance of power in Congress this past midterm. It's a great organisation, they send you emails on what they are planning to do, and you can either sign their petitions or not depending on what you agree or disagree with. The senators in my area have taken notice of this and will even send back replies when they recieve petitions...Try it. ; )
This is what I love about the people in my neighbourhood. They always answer posts with well-thoughtout comments. I've actually never heard that expression and it's a good one. There are so many situations where it can apply.Aging and housework come to mind.They both have to be done, but one can do it one's own way. ; )
Thanks, Farfaraway. I had to consider it the other side, because I'm originally from New York. When the towers in NYC fell, people there were beyond reason, they were so emotional. The idea that those buildings could go down was unthinkable. Family and friends saw people jumping from the highest floors to their deaths as a way to prevent being burned alive. The devastation and the life change was indescribable. The first question was, "how did this happen?" Not, why did this happen?" The country was ripe for the picking and the adminsitration took full advantage of that mindset. Five years later, these people who supported Bush are confused and bereft. They thought they were being protected and instead their trust was violated. I can only liken it to a child running from an adult who beat him to another adult for help, and that adult uses the opportunity to abuse him also. It's not a healthy or intelligent mindset to trust so heavily in one's leaders. Peole around the world don't do it, but that is because they have different lives and they've learned the hard way over centuries not to blindly trust governments. Here in the US that is still a novel concept in many ways, because we've only been around for less than three centures. It takes longer than that for things to sink it to a culture, particularly because we ar so isolated from the rest of the world. .At least that's just my opinion
Thank you, Ninja. BTW- I'm trying to read your post, but can't bring up the article. I'll keep trying. With a title like that one, it's too intriguing not to!

I agree re: 9/11 and Bush taking advantage of that mindset. I'm still completely baffled that so many Americans think Saddam Hussein and/or Iraq was responsible for 9/11. It's as if the name Osama bin Laden was never mentioned...what a con job Bush did on the American people.

But I also believe that only those who wanted to be led chose not to exercise any critical thinking skills when all of this erupted. People believe what they want to believe, especially if it makes them comfortable and they don't have to think much. It's a lot easier for Americans (most of them, anyway) to sit back and sniffle, "Why?? Why?" than it is for them to take a cold, hard look at how we've trampled the globe and abused our power for the better part of the last 60 years.

Patricia Volonakis Davis